Talk:Illustration

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Systems High‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Visualization.

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Suggestions[edit]

I think that this page accurately described the history of Illustration, specialized areas of illustration, and the many forms that illustrations are utilized. I think that the article would be more resourceful if it mentioned the many mediums that can be used in what is considered an illustration. A illustration can be composed of multiple mediums and those should be specifically listed. For example, a watercolor painting that is detailed with marker or pen is not just a painting, but an illustration. Defining that an illustration can be a combination of mediums can help researchers or aspiring illustrations understand what an illustration can be. Maddy Janacua (10/3/16 ) MaddyJanacua (talk) 03:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MaddyJanacua's suggestion is good, but as illustration can use almost any medium, I suggest scope would be too wide. A better place to discuss medium in detail would be in articles on specialist areas, many of which are linked from this page. MaryHutchison (talk) 13:52, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement drive[edit]

Updated to correct definition, remove duplicate (or near duplicate) images and summarise contemporary uses of illustration. MaryHutchison (talk) 22:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Graphics is currently nominated to be improved by WP:IDRIVE. Vote for it if you want to contribute.--Fenice 20:10, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article ought to be connected to Drawing (possibly as a synonym) and Illustrator. The current topic of this article would be more appropriate for Information graphics. Sbwoodside 23:21, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely not a synonym. Drawing may be a technique used in illustration, but they are not the same. Other media used in illustration include photography, printmaking, painting, sculpture, collage, etc.

Illustration intersects with the field of Information graphics, but it does not wholly fit in that field. Or it might be argued that Info graphics is a subset of Illustration.

In turn, IIllustration is a subset of Visual Communication, as should be Graphic Design.

--Renice 21:43, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

spam[edit]

Removed all the spam links-- which was all the internet links. Not one was encyclopedic. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 21:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam[edit]

Removed all spam links, none of which were encyclopedicRezimmerman (talk) 19:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Art schools[edit]

Many, many art schools in the world offer illustration. Do we need a list of those that do? An IP user has twice added two schools that do offer illustration but I feel this is not needed as it would mean listing every other art school. Plus it amounts to little more than adverts for those schools. She'sGotSpies (talk) 21:06, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-paste registration[edit]

In this edit some text is copy/paste here from technical illustration . -- Mdd (talk) 10:31, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Insurance[edit]

"Illustration" is also a word used in insurance, it describes a computer-calculated prevision of profits. Should be a different article Illustration (insurance). Nicolas1981 (talk) 08:37, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only 2d illustrations[edit]

When you read the depiction link in the first sentence, it implies that 3D rendering is not a form of illustration. Is this intended? Oicumayberight (talk) 22:10, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think so. That is more like animation. Hafspajen (talk) 16:39, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Childrens books[edit]

I think we have way too many examples of early 20th c/late 19th c childrens literature illustrations. i love them, and i am creating a gallery of them at the commons, but "illustration" is a whole lot more than that.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:35, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please add all Piero Ventura's artwork in HD[edit]

Many of his books are not printed today. Upload all his work in HD, and if there is a split photo, correct it with Photoshop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:410F:6200:C8DD:F971:F636:AB2F (talk) 02:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Illustration/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

"The earliest forms of illustration were prehistoric cave paintings." contradicts the definition above that illustration is associated with text. There is no text accompanying the cave paintings. SYS1dot (talk) 21:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 21:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 18:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Illustration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090814125052/http://www.industriegrafik.com/TIE1.htm to http://www.industriegrafik.com/TIE1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]