Talk:Indians in Bangladesh

Removed misleading text

the 2009 The Financial Express (Bangladesh) the artical was coming from obvious non RS, user-generated, irrelevant, hoppingly biased non RS sources/ opinion-pieces or is simply unsourced.

The 2014 Scroll.in article also reports a Bangladesh government estimate of 500,000 Indians in Bangladesh, but despite what the article title say, but inside that artical it doesn't say they are there illegal — Preceding unsigned comment added by AQWERTYE 345 (talk • contribs) 19:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Not in source quoted

Article carries the following statement "According to data produced by the Bangladeshi Ministry of Home Affairs, as many as 500

Indians were staying in Bangladesh illegally in 2009." I didn't find it in the source quoted.[1] Yogesh Khandke (talk) 16:42, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Deleting content

I am deleting unsourced or poorly/ improperly sourced content for various reasons described in my edit summaries. If anyone wants to contest my deletions, please make your case here.OrangesRyellow (talk) 18:09, 13 August 2013 (UTC) I have deleted some more. Actually, I have deleted practically the whole of the article because it was written from an unabashedly Bangladeshi nationalistic POV by mis/using non-rs sources. I have explained the reasons in my edit summaries. If anyone wants more elaboration on any point, just ask. Do not reinsert improperly sourced, non-neutral content in violation of sitepolicies like WP:V, WP:NPOV. Thanks.OrangesRyellow (talk) 18:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

They are clearly sourced, only citing POV and removing the referenced contents is not acceptable. If you have concerns regarding a particular source, raise it here.--Zayeem ^(talk) 06:52, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

• It looks like sourced to me. Why remove it? Hafspajen (talk) 10:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
• Oranges, your edit summaries are helpful but in these contentious matters detailed explanations on the talk page are best. I suggest (to all of you) that establishing which sources are reliable is of great importance--saying something is anti-Indian and POV is one thing, but proving it is another. Try WP:RSN if y'all can't reach agreement here. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 15:45, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Source

We don't need to add the government document directly, the figure of 500,000 Indians in Bangladesh is cited by The Financial Express, a major daily in Bangladesh and a reliable source. If anyone has questions about the reliability of the source, please take it to WP:RSN instead of removing the contents. --Zayeem ^(talk) 17:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Indians in Bangladesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2009/07/26/74259.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)