Talk:Intersection (sculpture)

This article was nominated for deletion on September 1 2016. The result of the discussion was delete.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles

Visual arts

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Redirect

Redirecting was not discussed in the deletion discussion, which I am transcluding below, but I went ahead and redirected "Intersection (sculpture)" to the appropriate section of the MAX Orange Line article. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:19, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Despite challences, the "keep" side has not identified which sources specifically cover the topic. Sandstein 13:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Intersection (sculpture)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nominator. Meatsgains (talk) 23:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Covered in multiple independent reliable sources. MB298 (talk) 02:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What independent reliable sources? duffbeerforme (talk) 12:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I checked most of the references in the article. I couldn't find a single mention of this sculpture by name. Some quick google searches similarly came up with a blank. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not trying to take away from your vote at all, but all of the sources mention the sculpture, so I'm not sure where that's coming from... ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:58, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe I'm missing something, but I look at, for example, https://trimet.org/history/orangeline/library/sustainability.htm. I searched for the word "intersection", and can't find it. Perhaps you could point out where it is? Same with http://www.pamplinmedia.com/pt/9-news/216346-75520-artwork-anchors-new-max-line-to-regions-history -- RoySmith (talk) 00:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Source

https://www.pdxmonthly.com/slideshows/2016/4/22/our-newest-max-line-is-an-art-gallery-on-rails

---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:42, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]