Jump to content

Talk:Islam in Australia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Needs work

[edit]

This article smacks of bias. The use of the term "right wing" (when many highly conservative Islamic scholars are themselves very socially conservative), gives the game away.

The article is quite underwhelming, it reads a bit like a high school project. I don't know enough about the topic but for those in the know, use Islam in France as a template. Htra0497 22:58, 30th January 2006 (AEST)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Islam in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Islam in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This information is incorrect

[edit]

Islam is not the second highest religion in Australia. Next time try using actual facts from the abs website instead of making up random bs. Loser 49.183.158.189 (talk) 23:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Islam is indeed the second biggest religion in Australia according the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Please read: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/people-and-communities/cultural-diversity-census/2021
and navigate down to the table labelled as: "Data table for Census article - Religious affiliation in Australia".
Please refrain from poor behaviour, going forward. This is your first warning. Bro The Man (talk) 08:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to remove section: Views on Homosexuality

[edit]

All Abrahamic religions within australia have their fair share to be criticised about on the topic of homosexuality, in fact it is a universal topic of discussion. To keep the same tone as presented in the page Christianity in Australia, i propose the removal of this section as it serves nothing more than to be a lightening rod and generate negative sentiment and division; i.e. a score card to keep track of people to verify whether they are worthy of inclusion or humanity. If people want to find out about muslims and their beliefs on certain subjects such as homosexuality, their are other pages available such as LGBT people in Islam. Bro The Man (talk) 09:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is biased that abuses WP:NPOV. This is page is meant to be informative about the Muslim population of Australia and how Islam came to Australia and the population grew and instead it is being used as a platform to attack Muslims and highlight enough incidence of homophobia which has been attributed to Muslims the entire section should not exist on this page but an alternative page and what is written does not account for the full story nor does it account of muslim activists and allyship of the LGBT community. While those things are important topics and should be documented, they should be done so on another page regarding sexuality discourse in australia. Bro The Man (talk) 10:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've trimmed this material to remove the views of individuals. A problem with this article is that some of its text was added a few years ago by anti-Muslim bigots who had no interest in providing a mainstream account of the topic. This aspect of Islam in Australia seems noteworthy, but it would be better to have more accurate material here if you'd like to add it. Nick-D (talk) 11:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your help, I appreciate your consideration and action. I agree with you on all your remarks.
Regarding your invitation to populate that section, I would happily agree to do so on a separate page. It is noteworthy but I disagree with the notion that it's a defining highlight.
One thing that's undeniable is that Muslims will defend any and all people's right to life, without exception or prerequisite.
While both the pages of Christianity and Judaism in Australia do not highlight a section for this topic, and I think it's a double standard to do so for muslims. Muslims and their opinions on this topic are spread on a spectrum identical to Christianity and Judaism and every other faith system. As well as on the spectrum of age group generations.
It would be disingenuous to summarise that diversity or pay respect to it with a 300 word excerpt.
Thank you again for making that edit, it's a step forward to peace and harmony. Bro The Man (talk) 20:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]