Talk:Jack Keane (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Sequel

Iam67Faja re-added several paragraphs on the sequel. These paragraphs cite no sources and sound like someone's personal opinion on that sequel and its sale. Even if we had the source, random forum posts by pseudonymous people are not significant enough to be quoted at length. The editorializing ("Many reviews were satirical and just tried to persuade others to buy the game so a better game could take it's place on the sale") is worse: That's pure original research. For these reasons I have removed that content again. Huon (talk) 19:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a possible source[1] if anyone should wish to try to make an encyclopedic entry about the incident. Ham Pastrami (talk) 03:58, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source