Talk:Japanese battleship Settsu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese battleship Settsu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 13:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Probably best to link Battle of Tsingtao, Washington Naval Treaty again in the body.
    What type of ship was Tosa?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Gotta love Japanese copyright law for these ships.
  7. Overall:
    Just a couple quibbles here and there, great work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 13:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

All done, thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:57, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Target ship, remote control.[edit]

It says in the body of text that it was converted to radio control. Then a sentence about how it was used to transport troops. Then it talks about how it was used to "train carrier pilots". I assume that by "training carrier pilots", it means that it was used as a target while under remote control, but I don't see what the remote control has to do with transporting troops. Could the order or wording be changed? --.45Colt 03:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by .45Colt (talkcontribs)

The text is chronological; nothing about being converted for remote control means that she couldn't have been used like an ordinary ship with a full crew aboard. Just need to disengage the remote activators or whatever.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture from 1910?[edit]

Please correct the underwriting of the picture. It could not show her one year before being launched.