Talk:Japanese destroyer Momi (1944)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Japanese destroyer Momi (1944) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Japanese destroyer Momi (1944) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 26, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Japanese / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Japan: Military history Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:44, November 25, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

If she's Matsu-class,

why is she listed under Momi class on the list of IJN ships...? confusedsailorman 03:31, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Momi strikes

"Chief Equipping Officer - Lt. Cmdr. Tsuneo Yonei " So why's he listed as "CO"? Or is this IJN for "commissioning crew CO"? Also, were the TT 1x4? 2x2? And Fitzsimons says up to 60 DC; I presume that varied by individual ships in the class. How reliable is the 36 for Momi? And while this page says "Peach", this page says "White Pine". Which is it? TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 23:25 & 00:14, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

B class review

@Sturmvogel 66: I already made this B class, but I overlooked a missing citation. Please see Construction and career, paragraph 2 at the end. Djmaschek (talk) 04:07, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. Hog Farm _Talk 18:20, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese destroyer Momi (1944)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 03:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will review soon. Hog Farm _Talk 03:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rohwer is listed as a source but not used
Article gives the name meaning as "fir tree", but Nevitt has "white fir"? It appears to be practically the same to my non-Japanese reading eyes, but maybe better to go with the exact translation in case there's some sort of different connotation with that?
Recommend a second ref to support the nature of Ikutagawa Maru as an ex-Italian reefer
"despite the presence of a nearby Allied convoy headed towards Lingayen Gulf. The two destroyers were spotted by American aircraft as heading directly for their convoy, so the Ikutagawa Maru may have already separated herself from her escorts by this time, and the three ships comprising the convoy's escort attempted to intercept them" - not in Nevitt. Maybe a misplaced reference?
Looks like maybe the page range for O'Hara should be 288-290 (barely hanging over onto that third page)?

I think that's it from me. Hog Farm _Talk

Thanks for looking this over. See if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:13, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Still not seeing where we have supported "The two destroyers were spotted by American aircraft as heading directly for their convoy", although I may be missing it. Hog Farm _Talk 22:16, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Finally found it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:03, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.