Jump to content

Talk:Jim Paredes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This stub article might be better put in the WikiPilipinas instead. :\ TheTechieGeek63 (talk) 08:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Jim Paredes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 April 2019

[edit]

On 01 April 2019, Jim admitted on his website jimparedes.com that he indeed was the person on the viral leaked sex video of a male adult jerking in the shower. On his website states, "This is very difficult for me to write, and for many of you, it will be painful to read". -source jimparedes.com W4vm (talk) 06:18, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

W4vm, Wikipedia has a policy on writing about living people, which is very strict about what we include. In particular, negative commentary about article subjects can only be included if it is supported by inline citations to reliable sources. I see that this incident has been covered in mainstream media in the Philippines and so potentially could be included in the article – my personal view is that that would give undue prominence to a recent event, and that this is tabloid gossip rather than encyclopedic content. If you disagree please make an edit request that states exactly the text that you think should be added, including references to reliable sources. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 06:48, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 April 2019

[edit]
Belladingbako (talk) 08:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request to add "Controversies" section

[edit]

Recent issues faced by the subject is supported by reliable sources

https://www.manilatimes.net/paredes-on-sex-video-admits-it-was-me/534393/ http://cnnphilippines.com/entertainment/2019/4/2/jim-paredes-video-scandal.html http://manilastandard.net/news/top-stories/291645/jim-paredes-owns-up-to-masturbation-.html https://tribune.net.ph/index.php/2019/04/02/paredes-viral-video-not-a-hoax/

https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/filipino-music-icon-and-duterte-critic-jim-paredes-pilloried-over-sex-video


BatangHamog (talk) 08:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]