Jump to content

Talk:John McCain 2000 presidential campaign

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleJohn McCain 2000 presidential campaign has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 25, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Mention of controversial comments regarding Asians

[edit]

I believe it is appropriate to mention McCain's controversial comments regarding Asians in the section regarding the South Carolina primary, as it garnered McCain bad press in that critical period. Jensiverson (talk) 10:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some more info about it.Ferrylodge (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It belongs in the Super Tuesday section, not the South Carolina section, because it mostly concerned the reaction to him among Asian Americans in California. More importantly, we're now giving it way too much WP:Undue weight. It wasn't that big of an issue in the campaign. The Alexander bio, which devotes 145 pages to the campaign, doesn't mention it at all as an issue, as far as I can tell. A brief mention at most should be sufficient here. Wasted Time R (talk) 22:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You may be right. But, this article now says no more about it than is said in the article on his cultural and political image. Why would it be undue weight here, but not there? If all that info should go anywhere, it ought to go in this article instead of that one, because he hasn't uttered the word in question since the year 2000.
Anyway, if it is just mentioned briefly here in this article, then that brief mention ought to include the fact that he only meant to refer to his captors, that many Vietnamese Americans were not offended, and that he stopped using the term eight years ago.Ferrylodge (talk) 01:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've moved it, and have tweaked the wording for context, but have otherwise left it all in. It now gets twice as much space as his famous Virginia Beach speech slagging Robertson Falwell et al. That ain't right. I'll come back to this another day. Wasted Time R (talk) 03:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that it's not right. The "gooks" thing is taking up too much space in both this article and the article about his cultural and political image.Ferrylodge (talk) 03:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In the other article, it's modestly relevant as an illustration of McCain's warrior-unto-"straight talk"-unto-blunt approach, combined with his underappreciated willingness to back off same when he realizes it's counterproductive. (That he hasn't said it since 2000 doesn't matter; the article is a history of McCain's image aspects, not just a current-day snapshot.) Here, it's only barely relevant; this issue didn't make much difference if any, and he was going to lose the California primary no matter what. Wasted Time R (talk) 03:24, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a sentence about Vietnamese American reaction to his "gook" usage. If it's mentioned at all, it must be made clear that most Vietnamese Americans are not offended and in fact overwhelmingly supported him in the primary. DHN (talk) 00:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Cultural and political image of John McCain#Support for McCain vs support for him using the term 'gook'

[edit]

Talk:Cultural and political image of John McCain#Support for McCain vs support for him using the term 'gook' Nil Einne (talk) 21:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on John McCain presidential campaign, 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on John McCain presidential campaign, 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on John McCain presidential campaign, 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:John_McCain_2000_presidential_campaign&oldid=1221193834"