Talk:Johngarthia lagostoma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Johngarthia lagostoma has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
September 26, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know
WikiProject British Overseas Territories  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Arthropods (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Land bridge[edit]

Has Ascension, an isolated volcanic peak on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, really had "land bridges" seriously posited for it since, say, c. 1970? Perhaps a direct quote in the footnote would shift the onus from Wiikipedia. --Wetman (talk) 21:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Johngarthia lagostoma/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ucucha (talk) 20:56, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

I'll be doing this review. It's especially interesting to me because I previously wrote on some Fernando de Noronha vertebrates (Noronhomys and the Noronha skink). Ucucha (talk) 20:56, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

  • In the description, is there anything to be said besides overall size and the color morphs? What diagnostic characters distinguish it from other Johngarthia species, for example?
  • The lead seems quite short.
  • I'm surprised there is so little evidence on populations other than the one at Ascension. I found this source discussing J. lagostoma eating sea turtle hatchlings at Fernando de Noronha. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2006.01.005 says it also eats turtle hatchlings on Ascension. doi:10.1590/S0074-02761958000100013 says it's very common on Trindade. This paper lists previous records at Noronha.

Ucucha (talk) 21:12, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

This paper may also be relevant: Turkay, M. 1973. Die Gecarcinidae Afrikas (Crustacea: Decapoda). Senckenbergiana biologica 54(1–3):81–103. Ucucha (talk) 21:18, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Interesting. I've had a look at most of the sources you mention. They don't add much, but I'll try and find a way of working them in. Lourdes Alves et al. (2008) is behind a paywall, and I only have access to the first page (presumably, as a checklist, it merely notes the species' presence there). I also haven't been able to find a copy of Türkay (1973), which would be very useful. --Stemonitis (talk) 07:35, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
When I get back to college (which should be within a few days), I will have access to it, so I can have a look for you. Ucucha (talk) 12:14, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Have you had a chance to seek out Türkay (1973) yet? It would also be useful for a draft I've got waiting on J. weileri. --Stemonitis (talk) 10:24, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
I'll have the PDF in a few days. Ucucha (talk) 11:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Excellent. Many thanks. I'm in no great hurry. --Stemonitis (talk) 12:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
I stumbled across Türkay's even more relevant Die Gecarcinidae Amerikas, and have now incorporated information from that into the article. It would still be nice to have Die Gecarcinidae Afrikas for other articles, but I don't think it would add anything to this one. --Stemonitis (talk) 15:36, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Great. I'm sorry Türkay '73 is taking so long; not sure what is going on. I'd be happy to pass this article, except that the lead is still too short; it should be a paragraph or two. (Also, shouldn't Johngarthia planatus be J. planata?) Ucucha (talk) 18:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes: planatus should be planata. I must have forgotten to update the gender; that's one result of upranking a feminine subgenus from within a masculine genus. I will have another look at the lead tomorrow. --Stemonitis (talk) 19:04, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
I have expanded the lead a little. Is it enough? It's now 169 words, which is about 15% of the length of the body text (excluding the lead, captions and the long quote), which seems about right to me. --Stemonitis (talk) 10:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Good, I'll pass it now. Ucucha (talk) 14:03, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

"Sinister reputation"[edit]

The article badly needs a section on what was indeed the "sinister reputation" of these crabs - currently this appears mysterious & unexplained in the traveller's quote near the end. There was evidently a Victorian "horror-movie"-style trope around these creatures, accusing them of mass attacks on humans, even eating them alive. I remember this was still going in my childhood, with a large illustration, perhaps in Look and Learn, of a Victorian castaway keeping them at bay with an oar, at night. Scary stuff. Johnbod (talk) 15:50, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johngarthia lagostoma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:13, 26 April 2017 (UTC)