Talk:Jonas Bergström (lawyer)

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This redirect has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media coverage of "affair"

During several days prior to his breakup with the princess there was intense media coverage of rumors he had had an affair with another woman i 2009. Regardless whether or not any of that was true, the debate was even held in the most serious Swedish TV news programs. Thus the speculation itself is an unavoidable part of this BLP even if it may be controversial. I have rewritten the text about it to make it perfectly clear that the rumors are unsubstantiated. SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:10, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Such information, though controversial, should be included but only with a source. You can say that there are 100 sources but if you cite none, the information can't be included. Surtsicna (talk) 19:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

Swedish WP merged this article with that of Princess Madeleine's today because there is hardly anything encyclopaedically relevant about Bergström now that the marriage is off. What was kept about him (in her article) was the fact that they went with each other for many years, the dates of their engagement, how and where he had proposed, where they lived together while a couple and the way their relationship ended, including the huge media circus lately about his unsubstantiated infidelity. SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:17, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. We should merge the articles. Surtsicna (talk) 19:24, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with large part (date of birth, infobox, etc) omitted. This person is no longer notable on his own from the moment the engagement is off. w.tanoto-soegiri (talk) 11:14, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody has opposed, so I will merge the articles. If somebody opposes in the meantime, it's easy to revert. Surtsicna (talk) 19:01, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If he's to be redirected, the link should be to the engagement section. Additional clarity is desirable here.

Peter ^Isotalo 09:12, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problem?

What is the problem for them? He is a man, not a woman. СЛУЖБА (talk) 21:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain, please? I hope you didn't mean to say that he, as a man, had had the right to cheat on her? Excuse me if I am mistaken! Surtsicna (talk) 21:48, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]