Talk:Joseph Larmor

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

‹See TfM›

Physics: Relativity / Biographies Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the relativity task force.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Northern Ireland

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Contributions to Lorent transformations to add

The following has been removed from relativity of simultaneity and some of it could be used here (keeping in mind that some of it already is in lorentz transformations):

Development of the final Lorentz Transformations

Larmor knew that the Michelson-Morley experiment was accurate enough to detect an effect of motion depending on the factor $v^{2}/c^{2}$ , yet no such effect was detected. He sought, therefore, the transformations which were "accurate to second order" (as he put it). His solution was to modify the first order transformations in two ways:

he included the Fitzgerald contraction (already known to account for the Michelson-Morley result and already in Lorentz's first version of the transformation) and
he introduced (or predicted) the revolutionary idea of time dilation, at least for particles whose motion was determined by electromagnetic forces.

Thus he wrote the final transformations as

x'=\epsilon ^{1/2}x^{*}=\epsilon ^{1/2}\left(x-vt\right)\,

y'=y\,

z'=z\,

t'=\epsilon ^{-1/2}t^{*}=\epsilon ^{-1/2}t-\epsilon ^{1/2}vx^{*}/c^{2}=\epsilon ^{-1/2}t-\epsilon ^{1/2}\left(x-vt\right)/c^{2},\,

from which it can be seen that lengths $x'=\epsilon ^{1/2}x^{*}$ are shorter by the factor $\epsilon ^{1/2}=\gamma$ and time $t'=\epsilon ^{-{\frac {1}{2}}}t^{*}$ is longer by the factor $\epsilon ^{-1/2}=1/\gamma$ for the moving system.

Larmor showed that Maxwell's equations were invariant under this two-step transformation, "to second order in $v/c$ ", as he put it. His transformations did more than this since a little algebra shows that the relation between $\left(x',\,y',\,z',\,t'\right)\,$ and $\left(x,\,y,\,z,\,t\right)\,$ is

x'=\gamma (x-vt)\,

y'=y\,

z'=z\,

t'=\gamma \left(t-vx/c^{2}\right)

which are the Lorentz transformations, for which we know Maxwell's equations are invariant to any order in $v/c$ . Einstein (1905) and Poincaré (1905) wrote the transformations in this form. It was Poincaré (1905) who named them as the Lorentz Transformations. Lorentz (1899) and (1904) had published the transformations in a similar form to Larmor (as above), and Poincaré was apparently unaware of Larmor's (1897) previous publication.

It is worth repeating the first published prediction of time dilation:

"... individual electrons describe corresponding parts of their orbits in times shorter for the [rest] system in the ratio

\epsilon ^{-1/2}

" (Larmor 1897)

Larmor probably would have thought of this as a dynamical prediction from Maxwell's equations rather than a general statement about the nature of time.

Larmor, J. (1897) "On a dynamical theory of the electric and luminiferous medium", Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 190, 205-300 (third and last in a series of papers with the same name).
Larmor, J. (1900) Aether and Matter, Cambridge University Press

Harald88 12:33, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Judd?

I had an adventure before arriving at this page. My journey began at Librivox; the fine people there have turned Poincaré's Science and Hypothesis into an audiobook with an introduction by a "Judd Larmor". In a less incurious mood, I google(tm) "Judd Larmor". Nothing. Hmm, that shouldn't happen. I know Wikisource has the book. I find it. But they only show a "J. Larmor"; the "J." could still be a "Judd". But this "J. Larmor" is identified as the "Lucasian Professor of Mathematics". So I google(tm) "Lucasian Professor of Mathematics" and I find the Wikipedia page (Lucasian Professor of Mathematics). A click here, a click there, and I find Joseph. So, who is Judd? Did someone just make a guess at the name? Or is Judd a diminutive of Joseph? (See "Bertie" Einstein). Just curious. Ingram (talk) 01:57, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph Larmor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061004061956/http://www.universityscience.ie/pages/scientists/sci_josephlarmor.php to http://www.universityscience.ie/pages/scientists/sci_josephlarmor.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:10, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joseph Larmor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]