Talk:Joseph S. Clark's and Robert F. Kennedy's tour of the Mississippi Delta
Appearance
Joseph S. Clark's and Robert F. Kennedy's tour of the Mississippi Delta has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 3, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Joseph S. Clark's and Robert F. Kennedy's tour of the Mississippi Delta appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 October 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Joseph S. Clark's and Robert F. Kennedy's tour of the Mississippi Delta/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 14:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
I'll review this one over the next several days. --Coemgenus (talk) 14:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Checklist
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]- General
- No problems with images
- Article is free of edit wars, etc.
- Honestly, I can't find anything to complain about here. this is a well-written, well-cited article. I'm happy to promote it. --Coemgenus (talk) 13:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Source list
[edit]Another source: [1] -Indy beetle (talk) 02:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Mississippi articles
- High-importance Mississippi articles
- WikiProject Mississippi articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- GA-Class American politics articles
- Unknown-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- GA-Class Civil Rights Movement articles
- Unknown-importance Civil Rights Movement articles
- WikiProject Civil Rights Movement articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles