This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
There are references in-text, and at one point the page says "6 sided octagonal JumboTron" - absurd! I'm going to clean this thing up as best I can, because it really needs it. Cheeser1 22:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Clean up: yeah. please Cheeser1 go for it. would note 3 different spellings (perhaps using redirect). JumboTron, Jumbotrone and Jumbotron. also, just found a simply written description here maybe of some use to you. http://bigbeefandbeer.com/jumbotronFAQ.htmBine maya 10:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC) okay — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 20:43, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
I think the picture of hte ABC video display shouldbe removed because it is offensive to christians, particularly Catholics, because of hte wording on it. people are unable to see the context or complete sentence —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 12:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
stop your whining. shut your piehole. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 18:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
I agree on Wikipedia's censorship policy but I also agree that the image could be changed to something more neutral. As much as it is good for Wikipedia to not censor info, it would also be good to try not to offend people where it is not needed. Ex. On the Jumbotron article. People should try to make Wikipedia more of an inviting place for all users. Frogger48 (talk) 20:24, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
That picture is wonderful and I hope it never gets taken down. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 14:20, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
The design section states to begin with that a Jumbotron is a very large VFD, later that it consists of small CRTs. As this, to my knowledge, is two different technologies a bit clearance on the design would be appreciated
Fixed. You are correct, VFD and CRT technologies are different. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 05:20, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
I know they're rather rare in collecting circles, but does anyone happen to have one (or a set of three) of the early CRT sub-pixels that they can upload a photo of? 188.8.131.52 (talk) 05:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved per request. The request is also supported by this ngram. Favonian (talk) 09:40, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
JumboTron → Jumbotron – Article is about the class of television rather than the defunct trademarked brand by Sony. Common usage is the non-trademarked form. Google it! MarcusQwertyus 10:12, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Support. Skimming through the sources, Jumbotron without the camel case does seem to be more commonly used as a name. JumbleTron with the camel case has been used generically in a few sources, like this ESPN article, but it occurs far less frequently.--SGCM(talk) 03:54, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.