Talk:K?d

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 26 March 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

K?D → K?d – Why is this article's title capitalised? There is no reason for this, and I cannot find an example of this instance in MOS:TITLECAPS. Lazz _R 22:43, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because no one bothered to add a {{lowercase title}} template. Feel free to add one. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 03:10, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pppery: Cool. I added the tag, but because the title is in all caps at the present moment, the D remains capitalised. The page title will be all lowercase if the page is moved. Lazz _R 09:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Lazz R: how is this name pronounced? Can you add to lead please. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@In ictu oculi: Hello, It is pronounced /kɪd/ "kid" (See description). It is already in the lead. Lazz _R 10:30, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Soundcloud plays in Career section

Hello. I've noticed that in the career section of the page, the text which follows the release of this artist's tracks always contains Soundcloud play numbers. This prompts WP:PROMO guidelines, and sounds like a advertisement about how successful this artist is on the platform.

The references attached also seem to be self published on Soundcloud, which is also an unreliable primary source.

Thus I requesting that the number of track plays in the whole section should be removed, as the track release details written there are already enough. aNode (discuss) 08:20, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Completely agreed. Removing them now Lazz _R 10:08, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the career section, I can't help but feel that the "reviews" from news articles are pushing the boundaries of WP:PROMO too... Lazz _R 10:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I'm looking at it, those 'reviews' are literally sugar-coating all of the tracks with compliments, I don't see any criticism on them. Although they come from reliable sources, I think we better rewrite some of those review summaries, to make it more neutral.aNode (discuss) 13:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, absolutely. If not, it'd be best to remove the majority of them entirely (but keep the sources as they are reliable evidence for the tracks) Lazz _R 17:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Name stylisation

Suggestion to overturn the lowercase title for the article name, based on the recent Deadmau5 discussion. The lowercase is purely stylisation, and we ought to follow MOS:SMALLCAPS and MOS:TITLECAPS. aNode (discuss) 10:47, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANode The lowercase title can be sorted by regular editing, there's no need to move anything as the Wiki software doesn't distinguish if the first letter is capitalized or not. Flooded with them hundreds 10:16, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, right right. Would an RFC be better in this case? aNode (discuss) 10:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but since no one is disputing, you could just make the change I guess. Flooded with them hundreds 10:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am in full agreement with your points, if it were me now I would not have requested the move above. If my consent is needed, then by all means remove the lowercase stylisation per the guidelines you cited. Lazz _R 18:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will do! I'll give this section a few days to see if any new points pop up, then I'll remove the lowercase title template. aNode (discuss) 06:15, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ANode: This is the {{lowercase title}} template, which alters "K?d" to "k?d". It was added by Lazz R (talk · contribs) in this edit, see #Requested move 26 March 2018 above. I really do not think that this is a RfC matter; see WP:RFCBEFORE - just discuss in the normal manner. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:46, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done, aNode (discuss) 06:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]