Talk:Kaiserchronik
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Neutrality[edit]
This article seems to give a number of judgements in a number of places without reference; do these come from third-party analyses of the subject work of the article, or were they the article author's opinion? It Is Me Here t / c 23:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- They were taken from the Catholic Encyclopedia. I have now removed these judgements, as they do not in any case reflect a modern consensus. --Doric Loon (talk) 08:26, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- OK, but N.B. the "best edition" comment is still unsourced as far as I can tell – only the source itself is given, not some review of it. It Is Me Here t / c 14:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Good point. But actually, it's the ONLY critical edition, so we don't need the word "best", which removes the need to source something subjective. --Doric Loon (talk) 10:30, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- OK, but N.B. the "best edition" comment is still unsourced as far as I can tell – only the source itself is given, not some review of it. It Is Me Here t / c 14:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- Start-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- Start-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Low-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- Start-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- Start-Class Poetry articles
- Low-importance Poetry articles
- WikiProject Poetry articles