Talk:Kendra's Law

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Kendra's Law is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Evidence of Efficacy POV

Since this is the same data as the data on Laura's Law provided by TAC join the discussion there. Here is a link: Talk:Laura's Law#Evidence_of_Efficacy_POV — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.207.28.154 (talk) 02:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I created an account. It was a lot easier than I had thought. I was User:207.207.28.154. JasonAJensenUSA (talk) 02:54, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support has no citations

It would be better to cite each source as to their support of this measure. Referencing the Treatment Advocacy Center's opinion that they support it is not a valid citation. see WP:SPS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JasonAJensenUSA (talk • contribs) 01:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Studies

The Studies section seems to contain WP:OR. The Cochrane Collaboration, which is a meta-analysis, is a secondary source and a WP:RS. The two New York State studies are primary studies, which haven't been published in peer-reviewed journals, and shouldn't be cited directly. In order to comply with WP:MEDMOS, we need commentary by reliable secondary sources, preferably editorials or commentary in accepted medical journals. I don't think the tables belong at all. For one thing, they don't give the confidence intervals. --Nbauman (talk) 07:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kendra's Law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060109153452/http://www.nyclu.org/aot_program_tstmny_040805.html to http://www.nyclu.org/aot_program_tstmny_040805.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article is far too long and detailed

As a result of its tl;dr format, a reader will tend to only come away with the view that the subject is a very contentious one. While that might be the most specific takeaway, this article takes far too many words achieving it. Where, in their advocacy efforts, previous editors were unable to describe studies succinctly, WP editors now need to step in and toss out much non-relevant detail. This "book" is too long and unstructured for Wikipedia.--Quisqualis (talk) 04:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]