Talk:Ketupa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Propose move from Fish owl to Ketupa[edit]

Requested move 6 February 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved(closed by non-admin page mover) Silikonz💬 00:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Fish owlKetupa – IOC 13.1 moved 9 species from Bubo to this genus. Of the 12 species now placed here, 8 have "eagle-owl" in their common name and none of these normally eat fish. I propose that this article is moved to the genus name Ketupa. Aa77zz (talk) 15:55, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Fine by me, makes sense. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 18:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree. Given that the genus now contains more NON fish owls than fish owls, this makes sense. Fish owl should definitely be a redirect though — and a good explanation given in the article as to why using the genus name as the article title is necessary (contra the WP:COMMONNAME argument). MeegsC (talk) 19:51, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, though the redirect and explanation will be needed. SilverTiger12 (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.