Jump to content

Talk:Kharnang Monastery

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cross-check location

[edit]

If I look at the coodinates and on a map I'd say the monastery is located in Baima County, Golog Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Qinghai - not in Sichuan ... ;) --katpatuka (talk) 18:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally one can find other Kharnang monasteries when searching Kharnang under http://places.thlib.org/ - so please re-check coordinates given. --katpatuka (talk) 17:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kharnang Monastery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The above link is given apparently in support of the recognition of Ronan Chatellier as a trulku of a lama of this monastery (reference no. 6 at the moment) but having gone through the entire menu on the link I could not locate any material relevant to the preceding text in the article. Unless someone can indicate its relevance I propose it should be deleted. --MacPraughan (talk) 08:09, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]