Talk:King, Ontario

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Canada / Ontario / Communities (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.
 

REMOVED: "It is also the site of Paramount Canada's Wonderland, a popular amusement park."

  • It's actually not. Canada's Wonderland is in Vaughan.

Oh...I always thought it was actually in King for some reason. I used to think it was in Maple, too :) Oh well. Adam Bishop 00:44, 3 Oct 2003 (UTC)

I believe it is, actually, in Maple (which is a part of Vaughan). If I remember correctly, there is a bus that goes from "downtown" Maple to Wonderland, which only runs during the summer season.

Fair use rationale for Image:Yorkregionseal.PNG[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Yorkregionseal.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


What's In a Name[edit]

King, Ontario or King Township, Ontario? 76.64.176.92 (talk) 16:38, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Ontario township articles on WP currently don't use the term in their name. I can't remember when that decision was made, but I know there was discussion about this. Mindmatrix 22:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
I'll also note that this is an official practise as well, as most of the municipal restructuring in the 70s and early 2000s resulted in every township being reorganized into municipalities. Stouffville Township is different from today's Whitchurch-Stouffville - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 22:59, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

POV[edit]

Just to explain why I added the tag, it is mostly due to the intro.

"King features a picturesque countryside, of which the rolling hills of the Oak Ridges Moraine are the most prominent visible geographical element. The Holland Marsh, considered to be Ontario's "vegetable basket",[2][3] straddles King Township and Bradford West Gwillimbury. King is also known for its prestigious horse farms and cattle farms."

  • Prestigious horse and cattle farms?
  • Picturesque countryside?
  • Oak ridges is most prominent visible feature? I'd say the Holland Marsh is by far the most visible geographic element of the area. The topography of the moraine in York transcends to the ravines of Toronto rather smoothly. It is not something that the every day observer will notice around them. On the other hand, the Holland Marsh is certainly something that, when passing by on Highway 400, turns your head and makes you think "wow" for a second. Of course my view is just as subjective. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 22:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
I just removed "picturesque countryside", and "prestigious" had already been removed from the article some time ago. I disagree with your assessment of the relative prominence of the Marsh vis-a-vis the Moraine. Almost all of King sits atop the moraine, and its hills are the distinguishing feature of the township - there aren't many places in King which don't exhibit this hilly terrain. It's rather difficult to not notice the hills. Mindmatrix 15:33, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
This tag was added more than two years ago; I've asked for information here and notified the user who posted the original issue. My notification was ignored for weeks before being automatically archived, and no response was left on this page. I'm deleteing the tag. If you restore it, please provide a justification for it so that I can address valid issues. Mindmatrix 22:22, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on King, Ontario. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)