Talk:Kirkandrews on Esk
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kirkandrews on Esk article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CCHT external link
[edit]This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do). Laplacemat (talk) 10:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Move?
[edit]Hi - I've just written Kirkandrews, Dumfries and Galloway. Wondering whether this should be moved either to Kirkandrews on Esk or Kirkandrews, Cumbria, and redirect set up at this page? Thought I'd ask here for thoughts before starting a formal move discussion. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 06:19, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- As the creator of this page (ie Kirkandrews-on-Esk, formerly at "Kirkandrews") I agree with you and have WP:BOLDly moved the page, created the dab page, fixed the incoming links - correctly I hope! Now to create a few more redirects from " on ", " On ", "-On-" etc. PamD 07:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- I agree, "Kirkandrews-on-Esk" qualifies as natural disambiguation and I moved the Commons category a few years ago in this way. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:33, 6 August 2020 (UTC)