Talk:Kudzu in the United States
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kudzu in Califorina
[edit]I have seen Kudzu growing along, and out onto Brea Canyon Road, in Orange County California.--Subman758 (talk) 20:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Expansion of environmental impact of kudzu
[edit]The environmental impacts of kudzu should be better stated - currently they are alluded to but not specifically mentioned. Its ability to choke out trees/forests and colonize disturbed habitats can be mentioned.Bkmertz (talk) 01:28, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Kudzu in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111119054038/http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/06/16/kudzu-biofuel-ethanol.html to http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/06/16/kudzu-biofuel-ethanol.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Rate of Growth
[edit]The introduction says that the growth is now expected to be 2.5K acres per year, but in the article it talks about 50K acres per year. Which figure is better established? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdfoote (talk • contribs) 21:20, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Differing Units
[edit]The article should not switch between acres and hectares. Area should probably be given in acres as this is the most common land area unit in the United States. Either way constancy would be nice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.85.227.109 (talk) 04:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Ecological Relationships
[edit]The line
- "While little research has been conducted on the impacts of plant invasion on atmospheric conditions, a study conducted at Stony Brook University in New York shows that kudzu has increased the concentration of atmospheric NOx in the eastern United States, which causes a 2 ppb increase in tropospheric ozone during high temperature events in addition to soil acidification, aluminum mobilization, and leaching of NO3- into aquatic ecosystems."
should be altered in some way. The study states that the 2 ppb increase in tropospheric ozone is according to their 'extreme scenario' for 2050. From the referenced study, "Kudzu invasion causes ozone concentrations to increase by up to 2 ppb during these high temperature events (Fig. S2)"[1] and Fig. S2 states, "Results are from the GEOS-Chem model for 2050’s climate conditions." [2]
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kudzu in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110526102822/http://mdc.mo.gov/landwater-care/plant-management/invasive-plant-management/kudzu to http://mdc.mo.gov/landwater-care/plant-management/invasive-plant-management/kudzu
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
misleading US Forest Service paragraph
[edit]The paragraph which began "Recent U.S. Forest Service information indicates that kudzu is much less of a problem than previously thought." is referenced as coming from Smithsonian Magazine. Unfortunately the author of that article gave no references (at least, not in the on-line version) to show where he got his data from. A review of USFS publications that were "recent" at the time of that article does not show any with the figures given. In addition, USFS publications consistantly refer only to forested lands. As is well known, kudzu prefers sunny locations and grows poorly if at all in pine forests. Thus I beleive the Smithsonian author has taken numbers in a USFS publication out-of-context, and assumed that a reference to the spread of kudzu on forested lands applied to all lands in the southeast. Out-of-context data will be confusing and misleading to the casual reader, therefor it seems best to remove the sentence.
"Fire-based" methods?
[edit]In this article, "fire based" control methods are mentioned. Are there really fire-based methods *other than burning* being used? If burning is a method, then say "burning", not "fire based methods". TooManyFingers (talk) 20:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Honors Introduction to Environmental Sciences
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 11 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): J is Grady (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by J is Grady (talk) 17:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)