Talk:LOCC

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

‹See TfM›

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer science

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Untitled

I think this article is far too concise and not correct enough in its language. For instance, it refers to two 'particles' in a Hilbert space -- never mind that Hilbert spaces are mathematical constructs which do not contain things called 'particles'! It also talks about performing measurements 'in' $\mathbb {C} ^{2}\otimes \mathbb {C} ^{n}$ or $\mathbb {C} ^{2n}$ which certainly needs qualification.

I'm mostly worried about how little this article discusses the usefulness of the paradigm of LOCC. It needs to be clear that it is a formalisation of the physical situation that two separate experimenters share a state in their joint Hilbert space, and that entanglement (whatever it is!) does not increase under such operations. By getting a grip on the sorts of operations which do not increase entanglement, we can attempt to quantify entanglement and how much of it is necessary for various Quantum Informational tasks. I'm hoping someone other than me will do this, but I will try to edit this article when I have time. Insurrectionist (talk) 07:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]