Jump to content

Talk:Ladlad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

War vs Rosales

[edit]

I added this moral war vs. Rosales. Since, Ang Ladlad is a political party, but it now douses itself on the moral aspect. And this sensational hysteria made waves: Ang Ladlad criticized Cardinal Gaudencio Rosales's statement per Radio Veritas on May 5, 2008, that "Gays should not be allowed to participate in Flores de Mayo since it defeats the true meaning of the celebration." Danton Remoto attacked the cardinal's statement, saying that: "In the eyes of God, everyone is equal; Some of these gay men have saved a lot of money for their gowns (to be worn in the procession) and they were doing it because they believed in the Virgin Mary. They need understanding, not condemnation."www.reuters.com, Manila bishop says against gay men in May parade Rosales however, countered that: “I am not angry at gay men. But, I am against what they’re actually doing.”queerty.com, No Homos At Mary Celebration, Says Cardinalmanilatimes.net, Cardinal: Gays out of ‘Santacruzans’ --Florentino floro (talk) 09:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the exact same edit as one you put on the Gaudencio Rosales page. One incident of clashes with the Catholic church hardly seems notable for a Filipino gay rights advocacy group or political party. This article would be better served by a general description of Ang Ladlad's relationship/struggles with the church, which I imagine to be rather strained. maxsch (talk) 21:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article is so bare, like a stub. It is starting to progress. I am here in the Philippines, and this moral war, which went beyond the political house of this party, became banner headlines all over our nation. It is their cry for justice and equality. So, if this is not notable for you, then, what is notable. Your edit or deletion is both subjective and towards vendetta, with bad faith. You cannot be objective, if you single my edits. Give chance to other editors, to edit, amend or delete my edits. In Wikipedia, all editors are co-equals. For sure, you need respite, rest and travel out there. Rest assured, you will have peace of mind, and upon your return, you can edit with fair neutrality in this great online encyclopedia. Be an asset instead of burden to this great book. - --Florentino floro (talk) 11:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I did not say you shouldn't add to this article. But make sure your edits are relevant and notable. maxsch (talk) 04:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
NOTED. I never add anything into an article which is not worth reading, meaning therefore, notable, by future researchers. Like Filipino and USA S.C. Justices, who are and were, from the very first day of 1901 and C.J. John Jay, respectively, highly divided on rulings, or final judgments, Wikipedia editors should rather follow not the literal but policy intents of Wiki rules. Please be guided accordingly. - --Florentino floro (talk) 04:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quoted URL

[edit]

Is the web address in the infobox correct? Looks like a bad copy to me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.184.30.132 (talk) 12:09, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. --Alynna (talk) 13:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Addt'l possible reference

[edit]

[Here's] a copy of the supreme court decision on the comelec issue. The case appears good enough to deserve its own entry but for now, it provides good additional information for the page. I could work on it if no one wants to but my hands are full atm Needsmorehotsauce (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ladlad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ladlad&oldid=1204168316"