Talk:Lara Croft: Tomb Raider

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Kelly Metzger (2 participants)
David McGarry (1 participant)
Stumble Guys (8 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (8 participants)
Carlos Pesina (1 participant)
Atlus USA (4 participants)
Danny Mastrogiorgio (2 participants)
Super Mutant (12 participants)
Police Trainer (2 participants; relisted)
Beam Invader (5 participants; relisted)
Sephiroth (20 participants; relisted)
The Boss (Metal Gear) (4 participants; relisted)
Silfade (2 participants; relisted)
List of Fate/Grand Order characters (12 participants; relisted)
Balloon Brothers (3 participants; relisted)
Enigma Engine (4 participants; relisted)
ClanLib (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Tagline[edit]

Was the tagline really "Who is Lara Croft?"? It seems a little silly if it really was JayKeaton 11:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kind of late but it should be done[edit]

Lara Croft: Tomb Raider Soundtrack --Tudor Tulok 00:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary[edit]

It seems like we have another plot "summary" here that gives a blow-by-blow account of the whole film. Summaries should summarise. — Paul G 15:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goofs[edit]

Why are these necesarry? Most movie articles on wikipedia don't have them and it's not a full list anyway. If you want goofs why not just go to the IMDb page, there is a link to it. I keep deleting the goofs section and someone keeps putting them back in it's completely unnotable information!--Dominik92 16:33, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree but they are gone now. Who was it that kept adding them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.247.244.120 (talk) 17:16, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cambodia[edit]

Coming from a Cambodian heritage, my family was not amused upon seeing the villiage in angkor full of people... Wearing vietnamese straw hats. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.211.191.19 (talk) 02:45, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Need source for claim in intro[edit]

The introduction section, in the second paragraph, claims that this film is "the highest grossing action film with a woman in the lead role" after Aliens. No source is given for that. And the source given in the "Box-office performance" subsection for the film's total worldwide gross, which is reference #9, doesn't seem to support the claim in the intro.^[1] I'm not sure how to interpret the data at that source, but in the Action-Heroine genre it shows this film to have a rank of 6. What's more, BoxOfficeMojo shows Aliens to have a lesser worldwide gross than this film, and in the Action-Heroine genre it ranks Aliens as #12.^[2] The BoxOfficeMojo list of Action-Heroine films as of the day I'm adding this places The Hunger Games: Catching Fire in first place, in case that matters.^[3]

So it seems the claim in the intro should be either reworded (for instance, to say that this film was for some time the highest-grossing…) or just deleted. John E. Branch Jr. (talk) 02:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

Historical Inaccuracies Section[edit]

The "Historical Inaccuracies" section could do with a lot of cleaning up. A large portion is plot summary, some of it is unnecessary "the temple at Angkor, Cambodia, is a historical site, but it does not possess any magical properties", and most of it does not even describe historical inaccuracies. I would even suggest deleting it entirely.

Elefnose (talk) 05:36, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT:

I changed the name of Historical Inaccuracies back to Historical Artifacts and Groups Used in the Film. I'm not sure why it was changed in the first place. I removed some plot summary as well. However, the section still does need some cleaning up.

Elefnose (talk) 08:57, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lara Croft: Tomb Raider. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150404182654/http://www.mania.com/tomb-raider-composer-graeme-revell_article_27089.html to http://www.mania.com/tomb-raider-composer-graeme-revell_article_27089.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=tombraider.htm

[2] ttp://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=aliens.htm

[3] ttp://boxofficemojo.com/genres/chart/?id=actionheroine.htm

[1]

[2]

[3]