Talk:Leak 04-13 (Bait Ones)

Leak 04-13 (Bait Ones) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 21, 2024. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Leak 04-13 (Bait Ones) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Electronic music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Leak 04-13 (Bait Ones) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 September 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a bootleg album of Jai Paul's unreleased music was named as one of the best of 2013 by several music publications?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leak 04-13 (Bait Ones).

Wikipedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Leak 04-13 (Bait Ones)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Joeyquism (talk · contribs) 01:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Heartfox (talk · contribs) 07:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"as "a catastrophe" → quotes in lead require inline citation per WP:LEADCITE
- Reworded, as I don't enjoy having to include citations in the lead.
"was almost immediately felt" → informal
- Rephrased to "'BTSTU' also had an impact on contemporary pop music" - if a different phrasing is better here let me know
"noted", "however" → WP:WTW
- Removed "noted", though I'm not sure of which "however" you're referring to here
"Some publications refrained from reviewing the 2013 bootleg" , " but critics who did choose to make note of it offered mostly positive opinions" → only one publication is cited to support each of these statements, but they are written as plural?
- You're right. I've removed this sentence altogether.
many of the genres stated in infobox are not supported in body
- Changed to just pop, R&B and electronic
Stephen ref missing magazine name
- Fixed.
Can you get a timestamp for the Masa interview?
- Unfortunately, I think the only audible proof that this quote is even legitimate comes from this clip on Soundcloud. I couldn't find any archives of Zane Lowe's interviews anywhere.
Not sure where DeVille supports that the album was released by XL
- Added the Pitchfork review to supplement this.

Heartfox (talk) 07:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review, Heartfox! This is one of the earlier works that I've done, and I'm realizing that it's in a bit of a shoddier state than I'd hoped. Looking forward to your further comments. joeyquism (talk) 13:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Heartfox, is there more to come on this? joeyquism (talk) 16:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do the genres in the infobox meet WP:EXPLICITGENRE? Heartfox (talk) 00:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pitchfork labels the album as pop and R&B in their review of the album here. I've since removed the electronic label as there aren't any direct mentions of an electronic label that I can find. I apologize for these errors. joeyquism (talk) 07:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joeyquism: Thanks, passed. If you are able to leave comments at my current FAC that would be great! Best, Heartfox (talk) 19:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, Heartfox. I very much appreciate your consideration, but unfortunately I cannot promise a review at this time as I am planning to take an extended wikibreak after completing my own FAC and have tried to cut back on my contributions in the meantime. While I may eventually have the opportunity to review your nomination, I cannot make any guarantees at this moment. I hope you understand, and I wish you the best with your nomination. joeyquism (talk) 21:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 21:11, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that a bootleg album of Jai Paul's unreleased music was named as one of the best of 2013 by several music publications?

Source: The Guardian ranked it at number 28 on their top 40 albums of 2013

Pitchfork ranked it at number 20 of 50...

... and Fact magazine ranked it at number 12 of 50.

- ALT1: ... that the leaking of Jai Paul's album in 2013 resulted in the arrests of two suspects? Source: A police investigation started during the Summer. Email addresses from the Bandcamp page and a linked PayPal account led to two suspects who were eventually arrested, their property raided and computers seized.
- Reviewed:
- Comment: I'm sure there are some other hooks in here somewhere; however, I believe these are strong as is. If any suggestions arise, feel free to let me know.

Improved to Good Article status by Joeyquism (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

joeyquism (talk) 20:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article was nominated within 7 days of reaching Good Article status. Article is more than 1,500 words in prose and sources are cited. Earwig picked up a possible copyright violation of 49.2%, but it seems to have come from a quote that was properly cited. Care should be taken to not use the entire quote. This is the nominator's first DYK, so a QPQ is not needed at this time. lullabying (talk) 05:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lullabying - I think the quote usage here is alright, as it's both properly cited and used to illustrate the grievances Paul had towards the media. If there is anything that you'd like me to address in particular (whether it be the quote or something else), please let me know so I may get to work :) joeyquism (talk) 05:45, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lullabying: Does the above satisfy your concerns? If not, what else needs to be done? Z1720 (talk) 19:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

- Seems good to go, then. lullabying (talk) 23:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Z1720: Does this look good to go? Sorry to be a bother. joeyquism (talk) 15:40, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joeyquism: I have no concerns. Currently, this hook is approved and is waiting for space in a prep set before it can be promoted. Z1720 (talk) 16:04, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]