Talk:Leeds Supertram

Trains: in UK / UK Trams / Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Trams.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Leeds Supertram is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edit war?

Is their a bot edit war going on with the rating of this page? Evey single day since Jan 20th-present (feb 26) has seen the article alternatley re-rated Start-Stub-Start etc. WatcherZero (talk) 01:12, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No the page has not changed since 10 June 2008 until your comment. I guess you are looking at one of the project logs, which one? It is usually a problem with the project template that the new BOT is picking up, knowing which project and log may help to pin-point the problem. Keith D (talk) 01:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK I have spotted the problem the class is different in the {{UKTrams}} template and the {{TrainsWikiProject}} which has the UKTrams flag set. This is causing the BOT to switch the class in the database each time it runs. The easy way to solve it is to set the two assessments the same or to remove one of the templates. If both templates are required with different assessments then you will need to inform the BOT owner of the problem. Keith D (talk) 01:51, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/leeds/
Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 10:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 20:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Leeds Supertram/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires infobox
Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Requires copy edit for WP:MOS
Route map/diagram may be useful

Keith D (talk) 20:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 21:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leeds Supertram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051215230641/http://www.gnn.gov.uk/Content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=176251&NewsAreaID=2 to http://www.gnn.gov.uk/Content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=176251&NewsAreaID=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]