Talk:LiMux

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Screenshot horribly outdated[edit]

At http://www.channelpartner.de/i/detail/artikel/3043464/1/2569742/EL_mediaN100BA/ there is a lot more recent sceenshot, which likely is a lot more representative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.59.157.255 (talk) 12:59, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Tone / NPOV[edit]

"Like the fall of the Berlin Wall, LiMux signals to public and private decision makers around the world that life beyond the existing order is possible."

This sentence seems very biased; should we really be comparing the LiMux Project to the fall of the Berlin Wall..? Removal/rewrite necessary? Apollosfire 04:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh no...[edit]

The poetry, the grandeur! It's about computer operating systems ffs.

and no, I'm not going to sign my comment. Ban my ip if you wish —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.181.74.22 (talk) 23:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC).

Mistake about the distro ?[edit]

I am just noticed that's the article speak about SuSE instead of Debian... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.221.150.88 (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Why not tell the truth?[edit]

Why not edit the article and state plain and simple that this migration never happened and it's an utmost failure? Chances are that every single of those 14K machines have been replaced more than once in the last 8 (eight) years, yet they are still running Windows. This article is misleading and reflects a certain partiality amongst some of Wikipedia's authors and editors.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.62.208.238 (talk) 22:36, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Perhaps there was a development in 2011 that led you to believe that Munich scrapped the project, but later reports evidence that it is thriving. –Ringbang (talk) 00:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

old screenshot[edit]

As far as I know the current environment is KDE 3.5, isn't there a newer screenshot? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.54.111.76 (talk) 15:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)