Talk:Liquid

Physics Top‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Materials High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Nomination for Good Article[edit]

I am nominating the article for Good Article status.

I will try to determine if it meets the criteria. ScientistBuilder (talk) 15:54, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, without even reading the content it will be a quick fail as there are too many uncited statements and paragraphs. Polyamorph (talk) 16:02, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I cited everything that I added, with the exception of the intro, which is more or less just an expansion of the lede. That actually came from back in the Logger9 days (remember him?), when I was trying to help translate his work into something the average reader could understand. I was still pretty new back then.

There's one paragraph in the Applications section without a cite, but it was originally part of the paragraph below, and someone came along and divided it into two. To this day, I often don't bother to put a citation for every paragraph if all the material came from the same source, because it seems redundant and over-citing, so that's something to always look for. Still, most of the uncited material looks like it should be relatively easy to find sources for, but I think this article may still need a substantial amount of work to elevate it to good-article status. There are still a lot of unanswered questions here, so it may be worth it to take some time to improve it first, and then you'd have a far better chance of getting it through the GA process. Zaereth (talk) 22:03, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Describe physics of matter interms of microscopic explanation of the four states of matter[edit]

Describe 129.140.0.25 (talk) 09:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Closely packed, loosely packed, spread apart, and bound by electric and magnetic fields. How's that? Zaereth (talk) 22:42, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why is liquid a locked article?[edit]

what controversy could possibly be making the warriors grab their keyboards? 106.128.96.97 (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the page is semi-protected due to persistent vandalism. If you would like to make an edit you have two options. 1) Make an edit request here, or 2) create an account and wait 4 days (after 10 edits). Polyamorph (talk) 15:37, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]