This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
I have noticed that people with surnames beginning with "aa" being placed first in the lists. However, "aa" is equivalent to the letter "å", the last letter in the Norwegian alphabet. Thus, these people should be placed at the end of the lists, rather than the front. For example, Erling Haaland is placed as the first h in the football section before Vebjørn Hagen, when he should, in fact, be the last h, after Øystein Hesjedal.—Profzed!22:13, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Profzed, the English Wikipedia follows sorting conventions for the English language, not the Norwegian alphabet (even though this is a Norwegian topic). Norwegian sorting will not be intuitive for speakers of English, who are the primary audience for the English Wikipedia. While there is no specific MOS for Norwegian topics, similar country-level MOS subpages say to ignore diacritics and/or follow English-language sorting conventions. See Japan, Poland, Ireland for a few examples. Our category sort keys are also done the same way. I intend to revert your change, please do not reinstate it unless you can point to a clear consensus that Norwegian articles should go against our conventions. ♠PMC♠ (talk)22:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
