Talk:List of Star Wars species (F–J)

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Star Wars Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Someone seems to have been trolling with the 'Hepler' species, as it mentions Twitter and "fapfiction". Just wanted to note this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.174.204.238 (talk) 00:11, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gungan Deletion

I reverted a deletion of Gungans; there doesn't seem to be a seperate article on them, as going to that page links back here, and they're currently not here.

--Starseeker shkm 12:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comparisons

Gungans and Naboo as Sparta and Athens? Seems like far too much of a stretch, and unsourced. I'd say, get rid of it.

Noclevername 12:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like original research, unless we've got a source that says Lucas previewed 300 over half a decade ago...

68.102.179.135 03:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No biggy on hutt

In the section on Hutts, there was a link for "Gardulla the Huut", I deleted this, because it rederected you to the wikipedia article on Hutts. Also considering how important Jabba is, I think that there should be a lot more information on hutts than there is now. (About one sentence.)Thats all. --Robin63 23:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Asexual Gungans?

I was looking through the starwars.com databank, and it specifically says there are male and female Gungans. Is it not a reputable source? Saberclaw 16:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iktotchi

I don't know how "canon" it is, but the race has a pretty nice section in the Star Wars RPG books. It'd actually verify almost everything in the entry about them. Again, I don't know the official stance on it, but the book that describes the races has a pretty decent description of a lot (a lot!) of them. 68.102.179.135 03:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A possible citation on their precognitive abilities is the last book of the Darth Bane trilogy - Dynasty of Evil. In describing the Huntress, the book describes her species as that of having an affinity for the force and manifests as weak precognition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chesterlaww (talk • contribs) 15:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Iridorian

Anybody seen these people outside of one NPC in a bar in Knights of the Old Republic? 68.102.179.135 03:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In KOTOR 1 I have seen them wandering Upper City apartments in the first planet. I am not further than that in KOTOR 1 currently. The end of the Ithorian section references KOTOR 2 and says that the Jedi exile helped the Ithorians with the restoration. This is not canon because in the game that has this situation, you can choose to help or oppose the Ithorians. Sir Akroy 17:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I have found numerous places saying that light side is canon, so ignore most of my previous comment. :-)Sir Akroy 15:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jawa

don't you think jawas are a bit major not to have their own article?--Sonicobbsessed 17:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At the very least, they need to be fleshed out a bit. They're a pretty major race in the a New Hope. Jsywulak (talk) 20:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely they need their own article. Tusken Raiders even have their own article and Jawas are more important than them.

Oisín Allen

But why does Jawa redirect here? They are not even in this article. Is this a mistake? ~ GoldenGoose100 (talk) 21:09, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iridonian and Zabrak

Iridonian isn't the official name for the species. Zabrak is the official name not Iridonian. It's mixed up here, Zabrak are sometimes called Iridonians not Iridonians are sometimes called Zabrak. look on |here.German16rs 22:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here be uncited cruft

And I would like to see some heavy-duty, citation from a variety of reliable, verifiable sources. I will wait about a week and begin trimming away anything uncited. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 05:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Massive weight under estimation?

Physically, Gamorreans appear in Return of the Jedi as greenish, slimy (and apparently smelly) pig-like creatures. They are about 1.8 metres (6 ft) tall and weigh about 100 kilograms (220 lb). Judging by their height and build, I would not think 2201b is not enough! Dainamo (talk) 22:56, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Star Wars species (F–J). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Jin'Ha" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Jin'Ha. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 22#Jin'Ha until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]