Talk:List of asteroid close approaches to Earth
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of asteroid close approaches to Earth article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|WikiProject Solar System||(Rated List-class, Mid-importance)|
What is a record-setting asteroid?
What is a record-setting asteroid and how will Wikipedia define the list(s)? Is it only asteroids/meteoroids that set a new record such as 2011 CQ1 being the closest, 2004 FU162 being the very early on, and 2008 TS26 being the smallest (based on absolute magnitude)? Is an object like 2012 KT42 worthy of mention since it technically does not set any new close-approach record? -- Kheider (talk) 19:39, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- I do not get how some of these are record-setting. It seems to me that it would be best to take out "record-setting" and list close approaches by (1) date, (2) distance, and (3) size. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 03:17, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
The timeline section is confusing. First, the article is about record-setting close approaches. Are these supposed to be approaches that were closer than any previously known approach? It doesn't seem to be that way. Are they approaches that were larger than previous ones? Not clear. Secondly, the timeline is in reverse chronological order, which doesn't make sense. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 03:08, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
The "small asteroids" table doesn't make sense either. For instance, the table is in order by how close the approach was. But there was one of 20,400 km in Nov 2009 but a 34,000 km one is listed in Feb 2013. Why is this second one listed - it didn't break the record for close approach. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 03:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Proposed name change
I propose that "record-setting" be removed from the title and the article just list close approaches. What sets a record is ambiguous, because we are talking about both distance and size. Also, a timeline doesn't make sense as far as record breaking. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 18:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Kheider (talk) 19:50, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Support Alan G. Archer (talk) 21:18, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
I'm wondering if the tables need to be reorganized. Perhaps have a list of close approaches (leave ones that graze or impact in their own tables). Have it listed in chronological order, but make it a sortable table so the reader could sort by the size or distance columns and look at record breakers. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 16:28, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- 2013 LR6 (~10 meters in diameter) does not seem to set any new records. Do we want to mention every 10 meter rock that passes inside the orbit of the moon? -- Kheider (talk) 01:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- Where does the article state current close approaches? An object such as 2012 KP24 is the closest approach of a non-impacting object of its size. 2013 LR6 is easily bested by 2011 MD. So do we want an ever expanding list of every 10 meter rock that passes inside the orbit of the moon? More and more of those 10 meter rocks will quickly be discovered as surveys become ever more sensitive. -- Kheider (talk) 01:56, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Edit request - Please add 2014 HQ124
- Done. See List of asteroid close approaches to Earth#Asteroids -- Kheider (talk) 17:13, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of asteroid close approaches to Earth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141231154154/http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/ to http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140307125729/http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/ to http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.