Talk:List of attack aircraft

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Aviation / Aircraft (Rated List-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
 
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the aircraft project.
WikiProject Military history (Rated List-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
List This article has been rated as List-Class on the quality assessment scale.


Sud Aviation Vautour should be included

To Indian Wiki members[edit]

Hi guys,

Could you please stop adding your beloved "Medium Combat Aircraft" to the list of attack aircraft from 2000-future, when all you have is a crappy computer graphical model?

Could you guys stop this craziness please?

-- a concerned human being —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.42.149 (talk) 18:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Update: now it's the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft, and has both a computer model and a metal wind-tunnel version. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:05, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Most of these are not attack aircraft[edit]

"Attack aircraft are military aircraft whose primary role in attacking targets on the ground"

Yet this list consists largely of completely unrelated designs. Among them are helicopters, fighters, bombers and even trainers. The MiG-19 is NOT an attack aircraft, it is a fighter that can be pressed into fighter-bomber roles. It was not designed nor was its primary role to be an attack aircraft. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)