Talk:Characters of the Kirby series

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 March 2024. The result of the discussion was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn.

King Dedede was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 November 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Characters of the Kirby series. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Meta Knight was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 November 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Characters of the Kirby series. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Characters of the Kirby series article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Characters of the Kirby series" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Archives: 1, 2: 30 days

Video games: Nintendo / Characters Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Characters

I wanted to add the characters introduced in Star Allies and Forgotten Land to the article, but it seems that only characters that appear in multiple games and are therefore recurring characters are allowed. I wanted to know if this is the case before I add them. 2601:547:CC80:4F00:F569:3AFE:8CFF:CEAA (talk) 14:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is currently the case. The character needs to have made at least 3 major appearances in games in the series. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. 2601:547:CC80:4F00:70DC:BC7:3C72:F6E9 (talk) 22:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The Three Mage-Sisters" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Three Mage-Sisters has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 8 § The Three Mage-Sisters until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

King Dedede article?

Hi. I would like to leave this message to remind everyone that King Dedede should deserve his own article. He used to have an article back then but got deleted/merged due to notability problems in the past. But times have changed, and I definitely think that King Dedede should have his own article again. He is the 2nd most popular Kirby character only behind Kirby. I also think that they're are plenty of reliable sources for him nowadays since he is popular and well-known. I hope this would appeal. Thank You. 50.100.46.100 (talk) 02:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most of your argument is based on "I think." None of that really works here. The AFD for the King Dedede closed less than a year ago and there haven't been any major Kirby games released since that would spark "plenty of reliable sources for him nowadays." In other words, if it was a problem less than a year ago, it's likely still a problem. So no, this is not a strong case to recreate the article. ThomasO1989 (talk) 04:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]