Talk:List of former municipalities in New York City

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Manhattan

There was never a Village of Greenwich or a Village of Harlem. Nonsense. I removed them.

There was a very obscure Town of New Harlem in the colonial period. The most easily found source, New Harlem Past and Present by Carl Horton Pierce, 1903, is not mentioned by later historians and I am not prepared to say how much of it should be relied upon. However other sources do at least verify the one-time existence of such a Town, and I footnoted one, a Colton map that shows the precise boundary line.JoeBrennan (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't find the Pierce book reliable, since it's thesis is that descendants of the original townspeople can make a fortune by claiming Harlem real estate. A 1907 history states that as of 1730, New York City included all of Manhattan, and strongly implies that that was the case in 1686:

The Out Ward comprised all of the land of Manhattan Island beyond the limits of the city proper, and the city jurisdiction covered almost all of the waters and islands of the rivers and the bay.
— John Austin Stevens, The Physical Evolution of New York City in a Hundred Years [1]

It seems likely that Harlem was, at most, semi-autonomous, perhaps only briefly. Fitnr (talk) 18:24, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Harlem may have had more legal autonomy for much longer than some may wish to believe. I put this on the discussion page for Harlem, but I'll re-post it here:

According to this New York Times article, from September of 1852, the author, a native of Harlem, notes that Harlem "is not represented in the same Council where the affairs of the City are so well and so wisely administered." The author also compares Harlem and the City as if they are two separate entities, though both within New York County, and notes that the thousands of readers of the paper, most of whom are New York City residents, have probably never heard of Harlem. Though the website requires a subscription, you can view the article for free by clicking the PDF link. 98.221.141.21 (talk) 17:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Village, Town and City of Brooklyn

When the City of Brooklyn was chartered in 1834 it took over the entire territory of the Town of Brooklyn. It was not created 'within' the Town of Brooklyn. I've inserted references for this, there are also number of maps from the 1840s and 1850s that show Brooklyn City stretching to modern Sunset Park and Bed-Stuy. For more verification, an 1835 New York State law set up a commission to lay out streets in Brooklyn, the result is shown here. Fitnr (talk) 14:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of former municipalities in New York City. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090427205006/http://www.lloydharbor.org/village/brief_history.htm to http://www.lloydharbor.org/village/brief_history.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.queensalive.org/queensalive_history.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1664 scope or earlier?

The intro defines the scope of this article as 1664 and later, but the body of the article also includes a bunch of Dutch settlements. There are also numerous documented Lenape settlements that could potentially be included as well.--Pharos (talk) 03:08, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]