Talk:List of highest mountains of Tasmania

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Tasmania Start‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal List of highest mountains of Tasmania is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

doh?[edit]

The first sentence talks of 15 mountains but the list has 10? Satu Suro 11:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

doh further[edit]

Links to numbers of mountain names show disambig needs to be worked on due to generally widely used mountain names - Satu Suro 14:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done :-) --Ozhiker (talk) 20:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Du Cane Range[edit]

As far as I can see from the LISTmap service, and from this link, the highest point of the Du Cane Range is Mount Massif, yet the article for Mount Massif claims it is only the second highest. The coordinates for Du Cane Range point to the middle of Pine Valley, which is not very helpful. Can someone point me to where the highest point is? --Ozhiker (talk) 13:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Federation Peak[edit]

I just made the prominence column sortable. The prominence given for Federation Peak (105m) is clearly incorrect. I make it to be around 800 metres, but this is derived from a contour analysis, not an authoritative source. 60.242.106.235 (talk) 10:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of highest mountains of Tasmania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060907185504/http://www.freewebs.com/tasmanianmountains/Tasmanian%20Mountains.pdf to http://www.freewebs.com/tasmanianmountains/Tasmanian%20Mountains.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]