Talk:Living Books

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I personally handled the localization of Living Books when I worked there as an Art Technician. Tortoise and the Hare was indeed localized, but the localized versions were never sold in the U.S. as far as I know. We did them in German, French, and British English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.207.23.39 (talk) 07:21, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

NOTES: † = Only English is available as a language for that Living Books Program. Just Grandma and Me is the only Living Books Program to have more than 2 languages. Many Living books were converted into Japanese as well and they sold very well in Japan.

LIES! I have The Tortoise and The Hare in English and Spanish, and it includes demos in the CD for other Living Books games which are all in more than three languages.

I'm not sure if anyone keeps this page up to date, but I swear on my own grave that there was a system (a video game system) made exclusively for point-'n-click games. In fact, we even had the game "My Grandma and Me" for this system. But I cannot seem to find ANYTHING on the Internet that says there was such a system. It also had other point-'n-click games, like a Haunting game (something about going around a house, checking under the bed for clues, etc), a camera game (taking pictures of the zoo wildlife)...

Someone HAS to know what I'm talking about. This system took CDs and the controllers were wireless (you had to aim them just right at the receiver or else your input wouldn't go through)... I think it's mascot was some kind of hero Chicken or something...

Please. Please. PLEASE someone help me out and we can update Wikipedia with our information. I can't even find the system's listing on GameFAQs.com... My family couldn't have been hallucinating, there had to be more than one of these around! 

---- Are you talking about the VIS system? I remember having one in the mid-90's, and the mascot was an owl locked in a cage, and you had to push a button to let him out, and if you didn't, a worm would show up and do it.

It featyred a lot of previews of other things, with Sam the owl getting in on it inbetween.

It also came with a bonus game called "SpaceNuts," which was a shooter that you had to fire at this huge mouth/vulva thing at the end.

Is this what you're referring to? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.206.69.158 (talk) 20:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard of a game system designed specifically for point and click adventures, but you can take a look at this list if you haven't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_video_game_consoles

Krunchyman (talk) 20:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Krunchyman[reply]

So, about The Art Lesson... I can now confirm it, it's definitely not a Living Book: http://wiki.scummvm.org/index.php/Mohawk/Games#Not_Living_Books

It makes it all the more puzzling as to why it was even part of that compilation to begin with.

Mr. Eight-Three-One (talk) 19:46, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTHOWTO[edit]

Please stop adding information about which buttons do what in the software. Wikipedia is not an Instruction manual. Toddst1 (talk) 16:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Living Books. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 11:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

5x expanded by Coin945 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Can we move the "Games in the series" bit down? Seems odd having it as the first thing in the prose (also, are these games, or books?) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Moved the table down to the bottom of the page, changed title to 'Titles in the Series', and reworded first two columns to clearly differentiate source material vs Living Books programs.--Coin945 (talk) 09:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've now reviewed the probematic sources and reworded all appropriate sections. The copyvio ranking for the top two sources are still 59.9% and 43.2% but basically all of this is names of books and titles of relevant officials (e.g. "Alberto Vitale, head of Random House Publishing" which need to be copied verbatim). I hope this will suffice.--Coin945 (talk) 11:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
After a major edit I'm now up to 61.3% for the top source. Let me have another crack at this once I've had some sleep.--Coin945 (talk) 17:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Upon investigation, I don't think I've really used too much from those top-listed sources in the copyvio ranking due to the reasons listed above. I'll do another pass soon, and would welcome your opinion.--Coin945 (talk) 17:25, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Issues with the hooks, these are more just facts about the subject, rather than a hook. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • A hook involving The LA Times criticized Disney for contracting their games to independent studios, deeming the series a "mere imitation of Broderbund's Living Books format. might be good, something describing it as a "mere imitation" is quite hooky for a completely different series. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Coin945, Lee Vilenski, this nomination page hasn't been edited since late October, over three weeks ago. What is the status of this nomination? BlueMoonset (talk) 00:46, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi @BlueMoonset:, I'm still keen to see this nom through to the end. I haven't heard back from Lee in a while, hope their doing okay! I'm happy for you BlueMoonset to offer a DYK review. :)--Coin945 (talk) 06:46, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Apologies for this, I'd forgotten about this nom - happy to support. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:47, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lee Vilenski, I don't see any QPQ provided, and Coin945 has far more than five prior DYK credits. Coin945, you will need to get moving on your DYK review if you wish this to pass. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- with QPQ done, happy to promote. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC) [reply]

References

  1. ^ Writer, Julia Angwin, Chronicle Staff (1997-01-18). "Broderbund Regains Stake In Living Books". SFGATE. Retrieved 2020-10-22.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ "Company History". wanderfulstorybooks.com. Retrieved 2020-10-21.
  3. ^ https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1996-01-31-fi-30595-story.html

.

Proposed merge of Wanderful Interactive Storybooks into Living Books[edit]

I have written a comprehensive article for Living Books which I believe makes this article redundant. Coin945 (talk) 01:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Coin945: I think it's fair to say that you can be bold and complete this merge. – Rhain ☔ 06:40, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As the Founder of Wanderful Interactive Storybooks, I think you have created a wonderful page for Living Books that fully captures their history.

And while you incorporated much of the content on our (copyrighted) Wanderfulstorybooks.com website, you have NOT incorporated all of the information and believe that having BOTH entries on Widipedia will help avoid confusion about the Wanderful products and history.

MW Mantle mmantle@wanderfulstorybooks.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.70.134.143 (talk) 20:56, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@73.70.134.143: Hi Mickey, nice to meet you! Thank you for your kind words on my 'wanderful' (haha) page. If there's any other info you think I should include in the Living Books article, let me know.--Coin945 (talk) 23:20, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Living_Books&oldid=1199351614"