Talk:Liz Prince

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 June 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Comics: Creators / United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comics creators work group.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Someone needs to capitalise the P in Prince. I'm too dumb to do it. →Done and done Ggfevans 09:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

The article was tagged for notability in 2013. Since then, one of Prince's works has received significant critical attention. Tomboy has won a Gold Medal at the Independent Publisher Book Awards [1] and was one of Kirkus Reviews' "Best Books of 2014".[2] Between this and the Ignatz Award, the bio seems to comfortably exceed WP:AUTHOR. I'm not even sure if I would describe this as a proper COI, but better to be above-board, so I'm reluctant to remove the tag myself. Grayfell (talk) 21:10, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please gain a consensus to remove the tag. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseph2302: Are you saying that you're blocking consensus on this edit? The tag was added by a drive-by IP who hasn't made any edits since then and this talk page is almost completely inactive. I'm asking for just a little bit more effort than that. Grayfell (talk) 02:04, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's no consensus, where is your consensus? Get a consensus on this talkpage, then it can be removed. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:51, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I'm trying to do, but there is no activity on this page, so if I just asked it would almost certainly go ignored. Posting a talk page section trying to build consensus would be a bureaucratic formality. I could then claim "consensus" and remove it myself, but that would be gaming the system, wouldn't it? Or I could then post a request after having posted that, but what's the point? Why add an additional step? Just because no one is paying attention doesn't mean it's not a COI situation. If you don't have an opinion, and aren't willing to evaluate the sources, leave it unanswered for someone who does. Grayfell (talk) 18:00, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus is not required to remove tags, or to make any edit for that matter. However, I don't see any evidence that an article is warranted on the person, rather than the books. An in-depth review of the book is a good argument for an article on that, but we need an in-depth biography on the person to justify this article. CorporateM (Talk) 02:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, AFD will work if that's what you think is necessary. Since this is going in that direction, and as long as there is attention being payed to the article, my reasons for being cautious about being transparent no longer seem productive, so I've gone ahead and made a couple of edits to the article. Further discussion should probably be held at the AFD. Grayfell (talk) 05:36, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Liz Prince. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liz Prince. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929122333/http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?threadid=59697 to http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?threadid=59697

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:08, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liz Prince. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150624040218/http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-23076-liz_prince_tomboy_a_graphic_memoir.html to http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-23076-liz_prince_tomboy_a_graphic_memoir.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]