Talk:Looe Bridge

Cornwall Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highways: United Kingdom Low‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

A fact from Looe Bridge appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the medieval Looe Bridge had either 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, or 18 arches?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Looe Bridge.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the medieval Looe Bridge had either 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, or 18 arches? Source: Each number of arches has individual footnote in article §Medieval bridge (1411–1853)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Zungeni Mountain skirmish

Created by MIDI (talk). Self-nominated at 13:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Hi MIDI, review follows: article moved to mainspace today; article is well written and exceeds minimum length; sources used are reliable; I didn't pick up any overly close paraphrasing from a sample of the online sources; hook is interesting (I wonder it it was repaired at various time changing the number of arches), mentioned in the article and checks out to hook cited; shame there doesn't appear to be a drawing of the medieval bridge online anywhere. Just awaiting a QPQ. One minor comment: you give the construction as being of "Slatestone rubble, granite" in the infobox but this is not cited or mentioned in the main body - Dumelow (talk) 13:57, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Dumelow: – all valid points! Certainly a shame about the image especially when it sounds like sketches were made by notable people. I do like to include images with my DYK noms, but given that the most interesting DYK material in this article is about the old bridge, it would be a photo for a photo's sake this time. I've sorted the inclusion/referencing of the materials~~, so just a QPQ to do now I hope~~. MIDI (talk) 20:12, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

QPQ now done. MIDI (talk) 20:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree that a photo of the modern bridge is not appropriate. All good to go on this one - Dumelow (talk) 06:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thousand pities

This rang alarm bells in my head. Leland was alive in the sixteenth century, how could he have been writing about the demolition of a bridge in the nineteenth century? Harrison in The Bridges of Medieval England attributes this to Henderson and Coates, and Google Books seems to corroborate this despite it being a snippet view. I've edited this.

I've also built a Wikimedia Commons category and linked to the pre-existing Wikidata page (someone built Wikidata entries for all listed buildings in the UK, which is nice). It was a great reminder of Cornish holidays to read this! Blythwood (talk) 00:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]