Talk:Love letter
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
References removed a few days ago and now no references tag is up again.
This page is continuously suffering at the hands of vandals and bad bots. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.251.255.13 (talk) 21:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
...Wait...why is the {{com-stub}} (for "communications", supposedly) limited to telecommunications?
A fact from Love letter appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 April 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Or _is_ there an existent communication (as in forms/means/culture/history of communication) stub?
Text messages
[edit]I could be mistaken, and honestly couldn't be arsed to find the appropriate citations, but couldn't text messages be considered a form of love letter? Maybe a see also would be more appropriate.. This is really only intended for inspirational purposes... 98.210.64.132 (talk) 10:43, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- Love letter 103.157.230.255 (talk) 21:48, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- C-Class Literature articles
- Low-importance Literature articles
- C-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- C-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles