Talk:Lycoming Engines

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Lycoming as a shell?[edit]

Textron eventually decided that the piston engine market was dead, and that Lycoming should exist only as a "shell", offering parts and service to the huge number of general aviation engines in service. Accordingly they sold off the turbine division to AlliedSignal in 1996, and started selling off the machinery from Williamsport in 1995.

Why does the Lycoming site list new engines for sale, if this is the case? I know I have seen Lycoming's booth regarding their engines the Oshkosh Air Show. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:36, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Also there have been major changes in General Piston Aviation market. Decidedly so the piston engine market is not dead as of 2006 but growing. Though Lycoming is no longer researching new engines, because of the increase in General Aviation sells for light aircraft, they are producing new engines. However the Diesel/Jet A fueled pistons are showing popularity and are starting to penatrate the US market, I think Lycoming will be folded once most of the market switches to diesel engines, mostly produced in Europe.

Fair use rationale for Image:Lycoming logo.png[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Lycoming logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Glaring omission?[edit]

I am a fan of a certain world war 2 fighter, the P-38 Lightning. It used twin turbocharged Lycoming engines, and developed 1250 horse power. This is possibly the most noteworthy engine made by Lycoming. Yet there is no mention at all of this. Given the P-38's great combat record, this should at least be part of the record for Lycoming. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.86.72.198 (talk) 04:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

That's probably because the P-38 Lightning used two Allison Engine Company V-1710 engines, not Lycomings. - BillCJ (talk) 04:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)


Lycoming museum brochure[edit]

On first view of that brochure (reference # 9 for this article) I found several errors; the biggest one in the capture for the pictured Duesenberg automobile. It reads: "Duesenberg J-299 Phaeton, Le Baron; Lycoming model J V-8." Of course, the Duesenberg Model J (J-299 means the engine number!) was a Straight Eight. --Chief tin cloud (talk) 12:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Where?[edit]

Where were the engines manufactured initially? The article is vague about that.--DThomsen8 (talk) 13:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Mistakes[edit]

"In 1939 Cord re-organized all of his aviation holdings into the AVCO group" This is not true for for multiple reasons. AVCO was formed in the early 1930s by Cord, and sold to Victor Emanuel in 1937. DonPMitchell (talk) 08:08, 29 March 2014 (UTC)