Talk:Lynsey Sharp

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Athletics Mid‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Running Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

2016 Olympics

I am not sure why my text is being removed.

Sharp came sixth when the first three were reportedly only eligible due to the hormonal rule change, enforced by a CAS ruling (and later reversed).

Given that Sharp won the sixth place, and three contestants in places 1 2 and 3, were only there due to the rule change, it is technically a given that she would have been third place without them.

This is obviously why she broke in tears after the race.

The text does NOT imply that she would have won otherwise. It implies that her results (sixth) were a result of this rule change. As explained above.

Besides, there is here a bait and switch argument dealing.

The removal of my text has used three separate arguments for the changes.

1) "non-encyclopaedic language" 2) " irrelevant to Sharpe, not an unexplained change" which is false as explained above. 3) (anonymous user??? why is this? lol) "Agree with former editor, implication that without the rule change Sharpe would have won the race"

there is obviously below par editing. And wikilawyering to boot. Jazi Zilber (talk) 19:02, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]