Talk:Majhail
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Majhail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061105190531/http://www.rajacademy.com/article.php?article_id=142 to http://www.rajacademy.com/article.php?article_id=142
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:13, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Redir?
[edit]After some recent heavy editing by Sitush, this has been reduced to a single-sentence-stub dicdef, unref'd and uncat'd. As it stands, this should probably be redirected to Majha. Thoughts? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:41, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Seems likely but I haven't done a thorough check for new sources yet & it is a pain on mobile. If someone does that & cannot improve things then I agree entirely. - Sitush (talk) 07:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Definitely. The page as it stands now is no better than a plain redirect. I'll change it now. — Smjg (talk) 09:37, 18 August 2021 (UTC)