This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
Mantainer Ardath is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
The contents of the Norton Snoopy page were merged into Mantainer Ardath on 2 November 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Not enough to support notability for this one, could be one or two lines in the Ardath article though Fram (talk) 09:45, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Fram,
I created both articles. I wonder if they could be kept separate, mainly due to human-powered airships being quite rare, and the Snoopy being special, due to that. I suspect Snoopy garnered some media coverage at the time (it was built as a promotional device for the Ardath). My own, limited, searches though have yet to locate any. :-( However, if the Snoopy retains its own page, then its very existence may help to elicit such material, and so help to bolster the article.
No, sorry. Unless or until the sources are found, it shouldn't stay as a separate article: we don't keep articles in the hope that sources will turn up one day. Fram (talk) 08:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The main thing with aircraft articles is that we generally insist on only one Specifications section per article. At present there is not enough data on Snoopy to be worth having one, and what little else is in there can easily be merged across and a redirect left behind. As, when and if sufficient data on Snoopy is forthcoming, then its article can always be resurrected. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 09:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.