Talk:Marcel Rewenig

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 January 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Luxembourg Low‑importance

	Luxembourg portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LuxembourgWikipedia:WikiProject LuxembourgTemplate:WikiProject LuxembourgLuxembourg articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No SIGCOV

Rewenig has zero SIGCOV sources, and as notability is a deletion criterion it is appropriate to tag him as not meeting the notability requirements for NSPORT. How else will anyone know he needs sources added?? JoelleJay (talk) 22:24, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed; sources need to be provided before they can be removed. BilledMammal (talk) 00:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11: You need to discuss this, not continue to revert; I note you are in violation of WP:3RR and as such would ask that you self-revert to bring yourself into compliance. BilledMammal (talk) 01:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The notability tag can not be re-added once someone has removed it, see Template:Notability#Removing this tag. Jevansen (talk) 04:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's an information page; at most it can be read as recommending that the tag not be re-added. The main point here is that significant coverage needs to be found; even most !keep voters in the AFD agreed with this. This will both allow the article to develop beyond a stub, and prevent it from being re-nominated at AFD in six months or a year. If you believe there is a more suitable tag requesting this, then please add it, but I believe the notability tag is the most appropriate. I also note that wasn't the only tag under discussion. BilledMammal (talk) 04:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lugnuts: Per WP:NSPORTS, WP:GNG must be met, and as there was no consensus that WP:GNG was met there are still notability concerns - this makes the tag appropriate. I will note that if we are unable to find this coverage I intend to return this article to AFD in a few months, as the failure to find sources despite the extra time will strongly suggest that they do not exist despite the assertions to the contrary at the previous AFD. BilledMammal (talk) 16:13, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Third or fourth time now - STOP pinging me. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:15, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to edit where I am editing then you need to be willing to engage in discussions with me. BilledMammal (talk) 16:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template must not be re-added... BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See previous response. BilledMammal (talk) 16:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See previous response. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:25, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is highly desirable, but not technically required, for you to add a list of good sources to the article or its talk page. If you can't be bothered to add such "good sources", and the problem is not resolved in a timely manner, that it is entirely justifiable for the article to be tagged, again (as removing a tag without actually helping to resolve the very real issue it highlights is not an improvement to the encyclopedia)... You might personally disagree about GNG being superior to meeting some of the rather loose NSPORTS criteria, but that does not make your position more than WP:LOCALCONSENSUS. Which can safely be ignored. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded the article a little more just now with some plaudits the player received in a match analysis by a local newspaper, but it's incredibly difficult finding significant coverage about players who were part of a much smaller league, especially when it was 85 years ago. This source does at least personally acknowledge his play during a game, rather than being a mere passing mention. Still, it doesn't necessarily satisfy indisputable notability. I'd encourage relisting the AfD under the circumstances but I still couldn't express a view either way. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]