Talk:Marco Roth

Untitled

Is this guy notable? I see one of several editors of a semi-yearly magazine who is also a doctoral student, and an assistant professor at a minor college who won a fellowship. No references of any real merit. Hardly strikes me as encyclopedic. -R. fiend (talk) 17:46, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

pew fellowship? Accotink2 talk 14:45, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Is that in itself very meaningful? If all one can say about a guy is "he won a fellowship" where does that get us? If such fellowship winners go on to accomplish something notable we could have a strong case, but without that we have "an organization gave this guy money". Plenty of people have won such fellowships, but I don't think many have articles in general except those who did go on to do more. It seems to me Wikipedia is stretching notability to its breaking point in some cases, making thousands of articles that say nothing, are not well maintained, and, sans the oversight I expect they're receiving, an open door to BLP issues. -R. fiend (talk) 23:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

$60,000 ain't hay. i invite you to try on the Afd. Accotink2 talk 04:15, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

So your argument is that anyone who gets $60,000 gets an encyclopedia article to go with it? Not sure I buy that. I'm considering an AFD, but it will have to encompass many articles, so I'm holding off for now. -R. fiend (talk) 04:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:46, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Can someone explain how this guy got a tenured professorship without a completed dissertation?

This seems extremely unusual.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theinvisiblehands (talk • contribs) 17:58, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Marco Roth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060326184614/http://www.nplusonemag.com/derrida.html to http://www.nplusonemag.com/derrida.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060326183527/http://www.nplusonemag.com/stupid.html to http://www.nplusonemag.com/stupid.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Marco Roth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091207024444/http://www.pcah.us/the-center/grants-awarded/2009-marco-roth to http://www.pcah.us/the-center/grants-awarded/2009-marco-roth/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101122005510/http://dissentmagazine.org/article/?article=3688 to http://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/?article=3688

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)