Jump to content

Talk:Marina South Pier MRT station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2014 has passed

[edit]

It is now 2015! 2014Q4 has passed! It should be open by now! --116.14.183.192 (talk) 14:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marina South Pier MRT Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Marina South Pier MRT station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 21:21, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • "planning area" what's that?
  • "2008 Land Transport Master Plan" this sounds notable enough for an article.
  • "Platform level of Marina South Pier MRT station." fragment, no full stop required.
  • "The North South line, " put the abbreviation here.
  • And then use it!
  • "at a contract sum of" contract is repeated.
  • "the waler components" what's that?
  • "which crushed the worker" what, the dislodged water?
  • "then-Minister for Transport" I don't think "then-" is needed, it's pretty obvious that it's a contemporary discussion.
  • "North South line (NSL), " should have done this in the previous section.
  • "station showcases two " not encyclopedic tone.
  • "two parts[22] using" move that ref to the end of the sentence.
  • "20 different shades of colours" why not just "20 different colours"?
  • "Prvacki proceeded to hand-paint the various slabs and united them" -> "Prvacki hand-painted the various slabs and united them"
  • Plenty of spaced hyphens which should be en-dashes.

That's all I can see in a first read, on hold. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 12:19, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk08:35, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by ZKang123 (talk). Self-nominated at 09:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: JJonahJackalope (talk) 14:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, seems to check all the boxes required to be approved. Article was recently promoted to GA, it satisfies neutrality, length, plagiarism, and source criteria, hook seems okay and fairly interesting, and it appears that qpq is satisfied, as this is your first DYK submission. Overall, good to go. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 14:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]