Talk:Maureen Cleave

A news item involving Maureen Cleave was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 10 November 2021.

Wikipedia

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

The Beatles Mid‑importance

This Beatles-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the project collaboration on at least one previous occasion.

To-do list:

For WikiProject The Beatles

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour (Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles.
Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article
Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs
Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood.
Verify : Beatle wives
Other : Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The Beatles' miscellanea

Check The Beatles' miscellanea to see if there is anything in it you can use. A lot of 'miscellanea' needs to be trimmed (as linked articles are improved) so please feel free to use anything before certain sections get zapped into the ether... ThE bEaTLeS aka andreasegde 16:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

factual error

Maureen Cleave has never "worked for the London Evening News" as your entry claims. This newspaper (now defunct) was the direct rival to her own employer, the Evening Standard.

According to Wikipedia rules, an entry cannot make any claims about a living person unless those facts can be sourced. Thus, if a biography has not been written about the person - and none has been written about Ms Cleave, neither does she appear in Who's Who - then you cannot even publish an entry in Wikipedia on her. As a lifelong colleague, my testimony appears to be dismissed as unreliable, because I am a "primary source" which to a journalist is a tool of the trade.

I have tried reaching people at Wikipedia with copious facts in the hope that somebody could insert them into this item, and no help has been forthcoming. But other than her published work, your rules about verification would disallow all other content. (Curiously you do currently allow one very tertiary source to appear as a lone footnote - why should this book-plug in the footnote be regarded as accurate? - when a quick google would provide several links directly to the full article from which the famous quotation comes.)

According to your rules, there is no proof that Ms Cleave ever existed, so why not delete this entry from Wikipedia altogether? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.155.200.241 (talk) 23:42, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]