This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mecelle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Turkey Mid‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palestine Low‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

This article was selected for DYK!

A fact from Mecelle appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 January 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Mecelle, the Ottoman civil code of 1877, was the first attempt to codify part of the laws of an Islamic state?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/January.

Wikipedia

++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 03:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mecelle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060626034731/http://www.bartleby.com/67/1339.html to http://www.bartleby.com/67/1339.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments regarding ethnicity of translators and name of Istanbul

@Sandstein: Hi! Re: this edit

I have two points of clarification:

1. Ottoman society was based on religious and ethnic identity. Greeks, Armenians, Bulgarians, etc. had their own languages and societies, and this was the basis of the millet system. While the "Levantine" Roman Catholic religious group was much smaller, they did have their own millet too, with their own laws. In regards to Ottoman and post-Ottoman societies (like Lebanon) I feel ethnic identity is highly important.

2. The entire city of Istanbul did not have the name Constantinople yet. From :

Edhem, Eldem. "Istanbul." In: Ágoston, Gábor and Bruce Alan Masters. Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire. Infobase Publishing, 21 May 2010. ISBN 1438110251, 9781438110257. Start and CITED: p. 286.
"Originally, the name Istanbul referred only to to the walled city and excluded all suburbs (including Galata, Üsküdar, Eyüp)."

In Ottoman times, in Turkish the name "Istanbul" was in use for the walled city, while in Western languages that was rendered as "Stamboul". The Ottomans used Konstantiniyye or other names for the whole city, and in Western languages "Constantinople" was used.

I notice the Ottoman Turkish version of the Ottoman Constitution of 1876 does use Istanbul while the French/Greek/English/etc versions use Constantinople. But Edhem states that "Istanbul" only applied to the entire city after the Turkish nationalist government was established in 1923, and in 1930 the government asked foreign embassies and companies to stop using "Constantinople". On TRwiki I would start using Istanbul after 1923, and on FRwiki/ENwiki/etc after 1930.

I am aware a lot of modern works do intentionally use "Istanbul" instead of Constantinople when discussing the Ottoman city. Edhem states on the same page that currently Turkish academia discourages the use of Constantinople in an Ottoman context (Edhem points out this is so even though "Constantinople" in that context is historically accurate). I assume this contributes to the usage of Istanbul in such modern works.

WhisperToMe (talk) 17:59, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]