Talk:Medal of Honor: Vanguard

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

The quality of the game

For some reason, people have dubbed this a bad game, but i thought it was good, could someone explain how a lot of people thought it was bad? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.108.122.252 (talk)

The article cites the game as receiving average or mediocre reviews, including statements from several major reviewing sites. Perhaps you would like to read up on those? --Scottie_theNerd 09:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know what they are talkin 'bout, it was fun for me too.-King Toast —Preceding unsigned comment added by King Toast (talk • contribs) 00:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Boxart

I know this is essentially launching feces into the fan; but since this is the very first Wii-released MOH, shouldn't the Wii box art be used instead? Just saying.--The4sword 07:45, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why? --Scottie_theNerd 11:43, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it significant? Besides, it's already changed.--The4sword 01:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why only the ETO?

I like this game, but how about making an MOH game about the 11th Airborne Division which fought in the Pacific (PTO)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.107.159.125 (talk) 10:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]